China Tech Crackdown Update – Too early to buy the dip?



What a week!

It felt like March 2020 again – but for China Tech stocks only.

I shared my views on the China Tech Crackdown on Monday, and I received amazing comments from all of you.

Whether it was on Facebook, email or the comments section, I’ve read through every single one of them – and I wanted to share updated thoughts in this post.

Lots to cover, lets go.

BTW – We just launched a national day promo for FH Investing Courses. Want to learn how to invest seriously? Check it out here!

China Tech Crackdown Update: What happened the past week

Update from the past week:

Monday – Rumours leak that Tencent is next in line to be regulated (to open up their WeChat ecosystem).

Tuesday – Tencent announces they are suspending user registration on WeChat “to align with relevant laws”. Tencent closes down 10%, as do most other Chinese tech stocks.

Regulators announce they are also looking into Property Management Companies, to bring down house prices.

Wednesday Evening – Regulators arrange a call with Chinese investment banks and funds. The message is not to worry about the regulatory crackdown on Edutech.

There are rumours that government linked funds have started to buy to stem the fall.

Thursday – State run media in China talks about the sell-off being overdone. Regulators mention that they are open to “other listing destinations”. Meituan closes up 15%.

Friday – The sell-off resumes. Most China stocks fall between 3% – 8%. SEC freezes all Chinese IPOs in the US, calling for increased disclosure requirements.        

Here’s a chart of Meituan’s price action to round up the roller coaster week. That’s an unbelievable ~30% trading range.

FH’s take on tech crackdown

In my Monday article, I shared my view that the crackdown was to force China tech companies to comply with 2 rules:

  1. Rule 1 – Comply with national strategic objectives
  2. Rule 2 – Sustainable competition (no anti-competitive practices)

If you haven’t read it, go and read it now. It sets the background for the discussion today.

TLDR version – check out our Instagram for a summary.

Just like Monday, I’ll structure the rest of this article in a Q&A format.

I’ll split it into the macro framework (big picture), and the micro stock level analysis (small picture).

Macro Framework – the Big Picture

What is an alternative reason for the China tech crackdown? A deeper, darker interpretation…The Darkness of Mankind

I received a very good comment from a China tech veteran.

He suggested that I may be looking at this all wrong. That there is no deeper, underlying goal to the crackdown. And that all this is done simply because some politicians want to retain their hold onto power.

I’ve encountered this view in the past. It’s especially prevalent among the older generation who lived through the cultural revolution.

I suppose once you live through an event like that, it changes you for life. And you can never forget the darkness of humanity – what lengths humanity will go to for self-preservation.

I myself have never lived through the Cultural Revolution, so I concede I could be wrong on this.

But I choose to believe in the goodness of mankind.

My personal view is that the CCP is not stupid. They know that the best way to retain power, is to rule China well. It is to deliver on economic growth, geopolitical power, solve demographic issues, solve social issues. They will try to do it the right way first, only if it fails do they default to a darker path.

But like I said – I recognise I may be wrong on this.

If you subscribe to this alternative view, then there is no greater purpose to the crackdown. It can be purely arbitrary, with the rationale created in hindsight.

Today it’s Didi, tomorrow it’s X CEO that Beijing views as a threat.

Yesterday it was the “Anti-corruption campaign” to remove political opponents. Today it’s a “Tech Crackdown” to take out prominent businessmen.

If you subscribe to this view, then China is basically uninvestable.

Whether you believe it or not, you need to recognise this is a risk of investing in China. This is not the US with its Rule of Law and checks and balances.  

Why is China doing this? Doesn’t this hurt their long term competitiveness by stifling innovation?

Yes – but China doesn’t care.

China has never cared, all throughout 5000 years of her history.

In 5000 years of history, the only thing the ruler of China has ever cared about is securing their hold on power. Watch the 宫廷 (China palace drama) shows sometime. There’s a lot of truth in there.

China is such an incredibly dynamic and vibrant land, that as long as you can secure power and create a stable system – the country will flourish.

Create peace and stability, and the 老百姓 (common people) will innovate, and commerce will thrive.

Look at the crypto crackdown. Sure, it will disconnect China from the blockchain revolution, and set back innovation for years to come.

But China doesn’t care. They only care about retaining power.

Which is why the darkness of mankind interpretation above, scares me so much. We could all be reading China completely wrong.

Is China doing this to kill the 2C business? To refocus talent into the Military-Industrial complex?

This view is more common among the westerners.

They see this as a soviet cold war style action – with China trying to cripple the 2C (to consumer) business, and bring talent into the military industrial complex.

I don’t agree with this one.

If you look at the five year plan and state messaging, it’s clear that driving domestic consumption is a big goal.

Heck, eCommerce (淘宝) is touted as one of the 4 great modern innovations of China (alongside Alipay (支付宝),high speed rail (高铁),and bike sharing (ok the last one didn’t turn out so well)).

In any case, this “talent” they speak of is mostly front end stack developers.

You don’t take a UI developer and turn him into deep learning AI researchers overnight.

What is China’s Endgame?

To better understand the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)’s end game, we need to look at China’s 5 year plan.

Think of this like a blueprint set every 5 years, that determines the direction for China over the next 5 years.

Lillian Li did up a great summary that I’ve extracted below:

My 2020 to 2025 Five Year Plan narrative is the period of the Great Reshuffle.

Similar to how on-premise enterprise software that gets by on license sales eventually switch to the cloud and recurrent billings. From the outside, the firm will see a few years of flat or moderate growth, but internally, they are re-architecture the bones of the place, shift emphasis from one department to the next and spin up new cloud divisions that weren’t there before. Theoretically, when the pivot is complete in a few years, they will be ready for more growth.

Aspects that marked a departure from prior FYP (and therefore emblematic of a reshuffle):

  • The lack of a concrete GDP target while others do have concrete number targets 
  • 35% of indicators are about social welfare, indicating a rebalancing toward social factors 
  • Shifting of achieving GDP via service sector to GDP via high tech industries (manufacturing and innovation)

Given the difference in emphasis, I think China aims to reshuffle from an export-led, light manufacturing base that prioritises unequal growth to a consumption-led, high-tech manufacturing-based, low-carbon country (with sustainable fertility rate).

TLDR – The shift is away from a fixed GDP target, to more social factors.

The latest reports suggest China wants to move away from the US model, and towards the German model. This means less financialization, and more manufacturing.

Exactly in line with the 5 year plan.

BTW – we share commentary on financial markets every week, so do sign up for our mailing list.

Don’t forget to join our Telegram Channel and Instagram  (or our Reddit Community)!

[mc4wp_form id=”173″]


Micro Level Analysis – the Small Picture

That’s the big picture – now we go into the investing level questions.

Would I buy blue chip China tech stocks like Tencent and Alibaba now?

Yes, and no.

Think of it like March 2020.

The sell-off hit all stocks across the board. Everything dropped.

Then the Feds stepped in.

But the recovery was uneven. Some sectors like eCommerce (Amazon) and Streaming (Netflix, Zoom) benefitted very strongly from the pandemic. Some sectors like airlines and hotels were decimated.

I think this is the same, only that this crisis is man-made.

The CCP wants to build a new future for China, a new blueprint. We need to understand what the post-crackdown China looks like.

Then we need to decide how each industry, and each stock fits into the broader picture.

In other words – we need to find the Amazons and Zooms of the post-crackdown world. And do it fast (before it’s priced in).

So the answer to this question is not so simple.

Sure, as a short term trader you just buy the dip and trade the volatility. But as longer term investors we need to understand the long term picture.

New information is coming to light everyday, that gives us clues as to what the endgame is. What started with Ant Financial was only the beginning. And by that logic, what we are seeing today is unlikely to be the end.

I plan to launch a deeper, China only stock watch on Patreon in the coming weeks (or week) to dive into this question. Do sign up to Patreon for access if you’re keen.

Are China ETFs good? Which ones to go for?

ETFs are good if you’re lazy and don’t want to stock pick.

But a note of caution – the China market is not as efficient as the US.

China is still early in their development, a lot of the great companies are still private, and a lot of industries are in the consolidation phase.

When you buy China ETFs, don’t expect something as efficient as the S&P500 or the NASDAQ. It’s more like the STI ETF.

Good ones to consider include MSCI China, Hang Seng Tech, FXI etc. None is perfect though, each has its own pros and cons. I shared more views in a recent article here.

Would I buy non-tech China stocks like Ping An or Anta now?

China is a very big and complex market.

The equivalent is asking if Nike is a good buy if Trump goes after Amazon. Sure – but the link between the 2 events is weak.

I like China, and I’m very bullish on China with a decade long horizon.

But really – every industry is different, and needs to be analyzed on its own merits.

For example:

Banks (ICBC, CCB etc) – their book value is a giant black box. Nobody knows the true value of their loan book. With China clamping down on real estate, a lot of loans may go bad (China banks have a lot of real estate exposure). But if you believe the CCP will prop them up, then you’re buying in at 50% discount to book and a 7% dividend. It’s a leap of faith.

Consumer Discretionary (Anta, Lining, HLA etc) – Fast fashion is a brutal industry. If you catch a stock on the upswing, the gains are massive. But you need to be very in tune with consumer tastes on the ground. Trends move especially quick in China.

You get the idea. You need to run the analysis for each industry. Very tough to generalise.

Is Tencent Music (TME) still a good buy? Has their moat been eroded?

Think of the Netflix evolution.

They started out by paying for content, and streaming it for a fee.

Over time, their competitors caught on, and demanded higher fees / refused to share content.

So Netflix had to create their own original content, which is the only true moat in the longer term. Own the content, own the user.

Same for Tencent Music.

They’ve built their empire today based on music exclusivity. Foreign music brands can only sell to me, not to my competitors. Consumers have no choice.

Going forward, that playbook is thrown out of the window.

Going forward, if you want to create a moat, you need to create original content.

Exactly what Netflix did, as did Spotify.

Tencent Music will need to evolve accordingly, and they’ve been investing big in original content the past year.

User base wise, they still have a big lead over the No.2 player, Netease. And they have backing from Tencent.

I wouldn’t count them out just yet.

Where would I put new money today – US or China?

I penned an exclusive Patreon article recently sharing that I’m worried about 2H2021 for stocks.

I think that:

  1. Credit impulse peaked in 2H2020 (lag time of 9 – 12 months means it hits in 2H2021)
  2. Fiscal + Monetary stimulus will taper going forward
  3. Real growth is starting to peak

With US tech at this kind of valuations, didn’t hurt to lock in some profits. So I sold some of my US tech recently.

China tech is about 10% of my stock portfolio today. US Tech Software is about 20% (Full Breakdown on Patreon).

With the recent China tech sell-off, and with US tech at this valuations, I might rotate some of my freed up funds into China tech. With a long term perspective.

Closing Thoughts: Is the crackdown over?

It’s been a monster of a post, and my apologies if I didn’t manage to cover all of your questions.

Any burning issues – just leave a comment below and we can continue the discussion.

What is clear – is that the regulatory crackdown is not over. Not by a long shot (in my view).

What started with Ant Financial was just the beginning. And likewise, what we see with Didi, Tencent and Edutech today, is unlikely to be the end of it.

CCP looks to be serious about reforming tech. Alibaba and Tencent have moved away from their golden days of value creation, into value extraction. The are no longer driving growth, they are impeding growth and development. And all that is likely to change going forward.

Like Lillian Li said, this is the period of “Great Reshuffle”.

Short term pain – to set up China for the new phase of growth.

As a long term investor, I think some caution is warranted.

Like with the Ant crackdown – it started in Nov, and even today it’s still playing out. I don’t think this crackdown on Didi or Tencent etc will be over so soon.

I will likely be adding to my China positions, but when, which, and at what price I haven’t decided. You can follow me on Patreon for regular updates when I do.

I would love to hear your thoughts – what am I missing here?

BTW – We just launched a national day promo for FH Investing Courses. Want to learn how to invest seriously? Check it out here!



Looking for a broker to buy China stocks? Get a Free Apple stock (worth S$200) when you open a new account with MooMoo or Tiger Brokers. Check out our review on MooMoo here.

Special account opening bonus if you’re new to Saxo Brokers too (drop email to [email protected] for full steps).

As always, this article is written on 31 July 2021 and will not be updated going forward. Latest thoughts (and my stock watch and personal portfolio) are available on Patreon.

Join our Reddit community at r/SingaporeInvestments.

Do like and follow our Facebook and Instagram, or join the Telegram Channel. Never miss another post from Financial Horse!

Looking for a comprehensive guide to investing that covers stocks, REITs, bonds, CPF and asset allocation? Check out the FH Complete Guide to Investing.

Or if you’re a more advanced investor, check out the REITs Investing Masterclass, which goes in-depth into REITs investing – everything from how much REITs to own, which economic conditions to buy REITs, how to pick REITs etc.

Both are THE best quality investment courses available to Singapore investors out there!


  1. You’re missing the credit flow controls.
    US & China view credit flows differently.
    Take bit coin for example.
    While it is almost impossible to outlaw it in the US, it is equally impossible to allow bitcoin in China.
    The Chinese leadership will never allow money to flow unchecked.
    The success of Alibaba & Tencent lies in the monetary system they have built. They were allowed to do so without state intervention. Why? Because the state knows they cannot rely on existing structures (aka the banks). Too inefficient, too corrupt.
    And now that the system is of a certain, trustable quality, they can nationalize it.

    Banning Bitcoin is not the same as banning blockchain.

    To reach the goal of one belt one road, you need to
    Utilize Chinese labour, equipment and more Importantly… money.

    The end goal is the internationalization of the Yuan.

    • “end goal is the internationalization of the Yuan”

      After the recent corporate interference/manipulation who outside of China will trust the Yuan?

      • I suppose we need to zoom out a little, and look at this with a 30 year perspective.

        In 2050, if China is by far the largest economy in the world, would we trust the Yuan then?

  2. Didn’t know about the rumour on WeChat being next. If you were to speculate, Do you think Tencent is next? And what form would the regulation take?

    How does this change the investment thesis for Tencent? Is this uncertainty already baked into the price?

    On a separate note, I think the party has to thread carefully. On the one hand you want to create a more level playing field which is understandable. On the other hand, if you crack down too hard, you stifle innovation. The potential upside is not as great if I can’t be the next monopoly. So they have to thread the needle very carefully to get the right balance in order to get the technological innovation they need to take them to the next level.

    Another separate and unrelated question. What’s the popular sentiment like on shore? Are people on Chinese social media generally supportive of the latest crack down?

    • Yes I think so. The report on Monday talked about closed ecosystems blocking links from competitors. Sounds a lot like Tencent to me.

      Regulation will likely be to ensure you can share competitor links on WeChat. And open up WeChat mini-programs (小程序) to competitors.

      Whether it’s baked in – that’s the million dollar question. Looking at Alibaba, the crackdown plays out over months rather than weeks, so in any case probably no rush to buy in.

      I get the innovation point, exactly what I thought when they shut down the entire crypto sector onshore. But then I figured between social stability and innovation, China picks the former every time.

      From what I hear – sentiment on the ground is overwhelmingly in favour of the CCP. People love it. Tech giants have gotten too strong for too long, and this was long overdue. From my albeit limited time in China, I am inclined to agree. This hurts investors and a select group of tech insiders, but it’s very beneficial for the 老百姓。

  3. Not an expert in credit. Able to explain this part a little?

    “Credit impulse peaked in 2H2020 (lag time of 9 – 12 months means it hits in 2H2021)”

    • Apologies, this was elaborated on in the Patron article. Extracted it below to give you an idea of the thinking. The crux is that the flow of new credit, from the G7, peaked in late 2020:

      Credit Impulse is basically the flow of new credit into the economy.

      COVID unleashed a massive wave of credit growth globally in 2020, and that powered stocks higher.

      The problem though, is that the bulk of that credit growth peaked in the second half of 2020.

      And when credit impulse peaks, the effects on the stock market usually show about 8 – 12 months later. Which is exactly around now.

      Just take Singapore for example – we had $100 billion of stimulus in 2020, everything from free rent to wage subsidies to cash handouts, And what do we get in 2021? Much, much lesser.

      We see the same in the US. After the record handouts from Trump and Biden (when he first came into office), the new $3.5 trillion stimulus is running into difficulty.

      The recent 5% inflation print (CPI) has worried a lot of moderate Republicans and Democrats, who don’t want to be seen approving big fiscal stimulus in the face of inflation.

      Small caps are the most sensitive to economic growth as they are the life-blood of the real economy. The fact that the Russell 2000 is starting to underperform the NASDAQ in recent works is not a good sign.

  4. I think your understanding of China is not quite there yet. I don’t think it’s not that China doen’t care about innovation. In fact they care a lot since one of their goals is to be a Science and Tech leader by 20xx (forgot which year). However they only care about strategic deep-tech (AI, space, robotics, quantum, chips, etc.), not consumer internet tech like Ali, Tencent, meituan (web tech). Notice out of the entire HKEX stocks, mostly consumer internet stocks got hammered the worst. Others like Sunny Optical, Xiaomi, SMIC, etc. are relatively unharmed. Of course, being largely influenced by Confucious ideology, country and society comes first before anything else. In fact, SG is similar in these aspects. US however, cares more about making $ (unfettered capitalism) whereas China tries to balance between socialism and capitalism. You can see ChiGov as the people’s protector and workers’ union — it provides checks and balance to the capitalistic economy which often makes profits at the cost of society and workers. Therefore you will see why US is lagging so much behind infra, societal factors (drugs, homeless, poverty, education, healthcare), etc. In China’s views, a crumbling society is not sustainable for long-term growth. China obviously wants to build a long-lasting empire.
    They have done that in the ancient times and they are doing it again but this time round using the tried-and-tested approach with adjustments necessary for this modern world where science and tech are very important and crucial besides just society. China long-term goals are: double GDP , become a tech leader, and to do that, it has to make some sacrifices.

    I would’nt pay much attention to Western news interpretation of China, as they have never understood Eastern philopshophy and way of governance and they never will. They will say things like oh lure talents to the military industrial complex — why? Cos they want to portray China as the big bad guy so they can sell more weapons. In fact, I dare say China doessn’t give a sh*t about military expansion — using military to conquer and kill is not in Chinese DNA. It is using military to defend itself (recall the Eight-nation alliance). It is being surrounded by very unfriendly forces (Taiwan, Japan, Europe, India, etc.)

    In China, every thing is damn competitive — limited Uni places, and millions of people fighting for the top spots at the top uni. Most average workers work 996 for limited pay which is still far from what we enjoy in developed countries unless they work in tech companies with better salaries. High housing prices in cities that you often need parents’ financial help to purchase, otherwise you can never own a house by your own ability.
    To me this crackdown “solves” many things at once, cling to power, societal problems, anti-monopoly practices — kill many birds with one stone. Why wouldn’t they want to cling to power, tell me which govt in the world doesn’t want to hold on to power? Don’t make it sound so scary, no government leaders are 100% selfless — they usually have some self-interests in mind. Also retaining power ensures a stable political system which would allow the country to thrive further. Nothing wrong with that.

    Regarding capital flows in and out, you may think China is a control freak. Why wouldn’t they? China is justified to be wary of anything “foreign” (again referencing its history with foregin invasion). It is always under constant ‘attack’ by foreign media, countries, etc. (xinjiang issue, HK riot, Taiwan, etc. etc.)
    It has every right to control every thing that flows in and out of the country given this context.

    Think deeper. Look at the history .

    • To add on to the deep-tech portion, why China wants deep-tech because it is trying to move up the value chain to grow GDP. It knows that cheap , mid and low-tech manufacturing will not give you high margins and requires a lot of cheap labor. Deep tech that needs intensive R&D and fundamental research provides wide moat, also it wants to be self-sufficient in advanced tech so it doesn’t need to rely on hostile Western countries (think of the semicon war) that can cut you off any time for whatever reason. You can already see it is investing heavily in semicon, space, AI, robotics, and other R&D areas. Who says it doesn’t care about innovation? It has an ageing population and capital-investive deep-tech industries will provide some relief for shortage of young workers and boost GDP growth at the same time. China’s Africa strategy is to build up the continent so it can ‘outsource’ many of these low-end manufacturing to Arifcans, thereby lifting China up the value chain (it is doing what US did to China for the past 30 years).

      Also notice after the crackdown, Tencent and Ali are relatively unharmed . The damages are limited (except for private edu sector which are essentially destroyed). They will continue to grow at 10-30% year after year in tandem with China’s GDP growth.

      But I can see why they did this to the education private companies. In China, healthcare, education, utilities and infra are considered basic needs for the people, and any private companies that dare to exploit basic needs for private gains are bound to be punished heavily.

      • Thanks that’s a great comment.

        Just to clarify as I think there was a misunderstanding here. What I meant was that between social stability and innovation, China chooses the former every time. China will allow innovation only in so far as it doesn’t compromise national security / social instability.

        Once national security / social stability is secured, then innovation can be directed accordingly.

        So I don’t disagree that innovation is a big area of focus. So much emphasis into basic research and money poured into semiconductor in recent years. 🙂

    • In China, there are many dare-devil entreprenuers and businessmen who often have no regards for the rule of law. It’s not that China doesn’t care about rule of law, it’s just that people like Jack Ma simply has no regards for law. There was a Bloomberg article saying that Jack often operates in grey areas where regulations don’t exist or are vague, and he is not afraid of going to jail (“If someone needs to go to jail, I will”). Also rumour has it that Jack has backing of the ex-president (JZM) . I’m sure he has broken many rules, pushing the boundary of the system many times in the past. The ChiGov has tolerated him for the past 20 years because they want to see how far he and other internet companies can innovate , and til last year, the govt probably has decided that Internet tech has matured and little tech innovation has come out of the sector (most innovations are biz model innovations anyways). Plus this Jack is getting out of hand, and so, the entire crackdown started. Also situation has changed, we have trade war, tech war, etc. and so the govt realized quickly that they need to be self-sufficient in deep-tech, and so this crackdown provided (hopefully) a way to lure talents to those industries. Given this context, I wouldn’t be surprised that the govt dares to use such heavy-handed methods to crush industries that it deems as ‘useless’ and ‘evil’. Also this is not the first time China has cracked down on industries, previously it has crushed crypto and P2P lending amongst many other things. It’s just that this time media makes it sound so scary plus with all the other negative china news floating around recently.

      To understand China, we need to understand what’s going on on the ground, not to view it from the outside thru especially English media.
      It has a very different culture and system, and understanding it needs fresh lenses.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here