Even the most disciplined investors can fall prey to cognitive shortcuts that skew decision‑making.
Confirmation bias—seeking information that supports your existing views—is just one of many pitfalls.
By recognizing and architecting processes that counteract these biases, you can make more objective, data‑driven choices.

This article was written by a Financial Horse Contributor.
1. Key Investing Biases & Their Countermeasures
Bias | What It Is | How to Counteract |
---|---|---|
Confirmation | Favoring data that confirms your preconceptions | Actively seek disconfirming evidence; play devil’s advocate |
Overconfidence | Overestimating your forecasting ability | Compare your calls against simple benchmarks; cap position sizes |
Recency | Giving undue weight to recent events | Rely on long‑term data sets; stick to systematic rules |
Loss Aversion | Feeling losses more sharply than gains of equal size | Predefine entry/exit rules; focus on expected value |
Herding | Following the crowd rather than independent research | Maintain a written investment thesis; revisit it regularly |
Anchoring | Relying too heavily on initial price points | Reevaluate with fresh inputs; use multiple valuation methods |

2. Strategies to Defeat Confirmation Bias
Devil’s Advocate Research
- Assign yourself or a colleague to challenge your thesis.
- Document counter‑arguments before pulling the trigger.
Pre‑Mortem Analysis
- Before investing, imagine the position fails. List all reasons why.
- Address the top 2–3 failure modes in your plan.
Structured Decision Checklists
- Create a standardized form:
- Investment thesis
- Bull case & bear case
- Key catalysts & risks
- Exit criteria
- Only execute once every section is thoughtfully completed.
Investment Journaling
- Record your rationale, data sources, and emotional state at trade entry.
- Review performance quarterly, noting where bias influenced outcomes.
BTW – we share commentary on Singapore Investments every week, so do join our Telegram Channel (or Telegram Group), Facebook and Instagram to stay up to date!
I also share great tips on Twitter.
Don’t forget to sign up for our free weekly newsletter too!
3. Building a Bias‑Resistant Process
Automate Where Possible
- Use rule‑based screening (e.g., valuation or momentum filters) to generate ideas.
- Set mechanical rebalancing (e.g., quarterly or threshold‑based) to curb emotional trading.
Leverage Quantitative Overlays
- Combine qualitative conviction with objective metrics (PE ratios, free‑cash‑flow yields, downside‑volatility measures).
Peer Review & Accountability
- Present your thesis in an investment forum or mastermind group.
- Invite feedback and commit to revising your stance in writing.
Diversification & Position Sizing
- Cap any single position at a fixed percentage of your portfolio.
- A smaller position size reduces the impact of any one bias‑driven mistake.
4. Ongoing Monitoring & Adaptation
Set Regular Checkpoints
- Quarterly deep dives: compare actual vs. expected outcomes, update your models.
- Annual “bias audit”: review your journal for patterns—did you repeatedly underweight bear cases?
Educational Reinforcement
- Schedule time each month to read behavioural finance research or case studies.
- The more you understand how biases manifest, the easier they are to spot in yourself.
Conclusion
Cognitive biases are hard‑wired into our decision‑making, but they don’t have to dictate your investment performance.
By combining self‑awareness with structured processes—checklists, pre‑mortems, journaling, automation, and peer review—you create a system where data and discipline override instinctive shortcuts.
Over time, this bias‑resistant framework becomes your greatest edge in markets.
