For those who missed it, the balloting results for the SIA 3.03% 5 year retail bonds are out.
As expected, the offering was upsized from the original S$500 million to S$750 million (S$300 million public tranche upsized to S$450 million, S$200 million institutional tranche upsized to S$300 million).
Weak Demand for SIA Retail Bonds?
What was less expected though, was how weak the demand for these bonds was:
To sum it up, any retail investor who applied for anything up to S$30,000 received their allotment in full. Which, to put it mildly, is not something you see everyday.
Going into more detail, the retail tranche of S$450 million received about S$526 million worth of applications, which is 1.17 times the upsized public tranche of S$450 million.
To put it in perspective, the Temasek 5 year 2.7% Retail bonds had S$1.6 billion of applications on a S$300 million public tranche (5.3 times oversubscribed). The Astrea IV Bonds had S$890 million applications on S$121 million of bonds (7.4 times oversubscribed). So 1.17 times oversubscribed is pretty low in comparison.
To be fair, the retail tranche of S$450 million is significantly larger than the retail tranches of the Temasek and Astrea IV Bonds, but I don’t think that’s sufficient to explain the large gap in demand. It seems that all that talk about retail investors being unable to gauge risk-reward for themselves is not true. Singapore retail investors are way more shrewd than we think!
And, as it turns out, it wasn’t just the retail investors. The institutional tranche had S$510 million worth of applications on S$300 million, so it was 1.7 times oversubscribed, which is pretty bad too.
I quite like how Mr IPO put it: “Compared to the above IPOs [Astrea IV and Temasek], i would venture to say that Temasek and Astrea left some money on the table for retail investors while SIA is more “stingy”.”
Well said sir!
If you were one of the “lucky” ones who managed to get some SIA Retail Bonds, does this mean you’re getting a poor investment? Absolutely not.
As mentioned in the original article, I think these bonds are perfect for a very specific kind of investor, namely:
- High net worth individuals with excess cash – If you’re a high net worth individual with 5 properties, a couple of million on the stock market, a Ferrari, and collectible art pieces, you’re probably looking to diversify your portfolio. These SIA Retail Bonds are a great choice.
- Retirees who want a low risk investment that is higher than the risk free rate – If you’re a retiree who mainly wants to preserve capital, and earn a return higher than the risk free rate, I think these SIA Retail Bonds are a great choice too. There aren’t really many choices out there that would fit your investment criteria, and this is one of the safer ones.
If you’re one of these, I think you should actually be happy that you managed to get far more of these bonds than originally expected.
I still think that the risk of default on these bonds is incredibly low, so if you hold them to maturity, you’re still getting a cool 3.03% a year, which is a nice 1.02% premium over the current risk free rate. Absolutely nothing has changed.
Don’t let the weak demand of these bonds get to you. Just because other investors don’t like this bonds, doesn’t affect the creditworthiness of SIA one bit.
Will this affect Retail Bond offerings going forward?
If you’re a GLC like SingTel, and you’re sitting on the sidelines watching SIA do a big retail bond offering only to have it be 1.17 times oversubscribed, are you really going to tap the retail bond market in a big way going forward?
The most worrying thing about this saga, is that the next Retail Bond Offering we see may actually have a smaller public tranche. And that would be a sad day for the Singapore investment scene.
Till next time, Financial Horse, signing out!
Enjoyed this article? Do consider supporting us and receiving additional exclusive content!
Like our Facebook Page for more great articles, or join the Facebook Group to continue the discussion!
[…] the past week over the SIA bonds which pay a mediocre return of 3.03%. I think folks like Financial Horse and D&S covered well in their research but as investors you should just give a […]